
I watched The Last King of Scotland this weekend. Great movie and great performance by Forest Whitaker. By following the young doctor, the audience is really brought into the film and can feel and understand the optimism that blinded him.
For my illustration I focused once again on the architecture. The architecture of the film was mostly 60’s modernism made of white concrete exteriors and paneled wood interiors.

It has always struck me how that type of architecture, like modern art is so often misinterpreted today. By stripping the buildings of ornament, the architects hoped to create a sense of equality. They meant to strip away the aristocracy that was associated with all the fluff of traditional architecture. They meant to start new, fresh and clean, and eliminate any preconceived notions of space, form and texture. (there was more to it, but this is what I took away from school. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong.) In the end however, these buildings tend to feel cold, stark and impersonal. They do not wear well, and they tend to make the visitor feel unwelcome, and unwanted. To me, they do exactly the opposite of what was intended. It fit the premise of movie perfectly. It got carried away with the optimism and the idea and forgot the needs of the people.